calendar >>>
> CLIMATE EMERGENCY RA…
> yj4tvy3izo
> yj4tvy3izo
> yj4tvy3izo
> yj4tvy3izo
add an event >>>
features
   anti-war
   migration
   climate change
   ecology
   students
   work
   health
   gender
   culture
   indymedia
   global news
   anti-nuclear
   anti-racism
   civil liberties
   anti-corporate
   miscellaneous
   social movements

 

announcements list
contributors list

about us
   contact
   get involved
   support us
   editorial policy

resources
   activist groups
   syndication
   links

radio
podcast

engagemedia

search


themes
   white theme black theme




 

 

 


printable version - email this article

View article without comments

Brisbane research identifies children's virus?
by Dr Kildare Tuesday May 29, 2007 at 08:52 PM

You know how they say that a virus can be catchy? Well here is a very suspect big Pharma contagious case if you ask me?

Brisbane research id...
kildard3.jpg, image/jpeg, 206x181

Researchers at a Brisbane hospital say they have discovered a new virus, which causes severe respiratory infection in children.

Perhaps they did and perhaps they also had help? I wonder if they also had any affiliations with big pharma? People who might help them with scientific knowledge, equipment, funding and a possible interest in the same economic outcome as well?

The Royal Children's Hospital tested more than 2,000 children with coughs, fever and wheezing and [allegedly] discovered the new WU Polyoma virus in 39 cases.

The hospital's Associate Professor Michael Nissen says the discovery offers hope to children with infections that they could not previously identify.

"Initially our focus is going to be on how widespread the virus is in the community, how you can develop antibodies to it, develop a reliable diagnostic test for the virus," he said.

"Then whether it's necessary to think about the development of anti-viral medication or a vaccine."

How widespread: Search for more cases?

How to develop antibodies: Provide more work?

How to develop a reliable diagnostic test for the virus?

How to develop anti-viral medication?

How to develop a vaccine?

How to promote and sell the medication?

And how to develop a sure fire bank account for big pharma?

What got me is the ABC produced this mother with a sick child who they say had a breathing problem but no "name for it"?

So now the new name is "WU Polyoma virus".

How corporate that just happens to be???

I don't know, but make up your own mind. But a serious journalist who is not affiliated and being paid to do so IMHO should try to follow up any specific interests that big pharma may have in the alleged claim and the research.

Don't get me wrong I'm not knocking the [alleged claim] especially if it saves a child's life or prevents some harm. But I'm sceptical of the propaganda, introduction on the ABC, and the mother example as a serious PR exercise.

On that basis one must consider what other interests are involved and to work out whether this is just another corporate sponsored endeavour?

Also whether this may also harm children and give parents false hope about what doctors do or don't know?

add your comments


Bushnell syndrome
by Dr rat Tuesday May 29, 2007 at 11:47 PM

Bushnell syndrome is a contagious disease spread by the bactrial virus ' candice questionaratitus.'
Subjects are unable to reason or string together logical or rational thoughts in sequence but persist in asking banal , irellevant and inane questions to the point where any reasonable care-giver may be forgiven homicidal thoughts... if not actions.
The best cure is extensive and lengthy quarantine in the 'hidden' wing of the acute ward and regular psychotrophics.

add your comments


Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
N© Melbourne Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Melbourne Independent Media Center.