calendar >>>
add an event >>>
features
   anti-war
   migration
   climate change
   ecology
   students
   work
   health
   gender
   culture
   indymedia
   global news
   anti-nuclear
   anti-racism
   civil liberties
   anti-corporate
   miscellaneous
   social movements

 

announcements list
contributors list

about us
   contact
   get involved
   support us
   editorial policy

resources
   activist groups
   syndication
   links

radio
podcast

engagemedia

search


themes
   white theme black theme




 

 

 


printable version - email this article

View article without comments

Male Gynaecologists a violation to H. Rights
by HR Saturday May 12, 2007 at 08:14 AM

Male Gynaecology and Obstetricians a violation of the principal stone of society “Family”. A call for action to defend the morality of families and the building of better societies.

Male Gynaecologists a violation to Human Rights

A call for action for more regulation or stoping of a medical practice by male medical practitioners.

Intimate exams perform by male medical practitioners should only be done if the patient accepts the gender of the doctor. Under no circumstances be forced to have an exam done by a male medical partitioner.

A woman that is married should be conscious of her decision of the gender of the practitioner. A married woman that gets examined by a male practitioner in such intimate form is committing ADULTERY if not, then is RAPE.

There are many female practitioners that can perform these exams. So why are there so many males doing it?, Who is controling the moral grounds of the medical profession?

The current practice today in developed countries is to assign a doctor for pregnant women without the consent of the patient – bringing shame and marital problems to something as beautiful as giving birth. Any institution that forces a male practitioner on a patient should be liable for rape.

The following is an example of an exam performed on a woman or an under age girl on a routine vaginal examination:

..- A doctor will insert one of two fingers inside the vagina / It will open it

.- It will perform a visual exam (inside / outside)

.- It might introduce a medical appliance.(virgin or not)

.- It might take tissue samples and also push the abdominal region of the patient

A male doctor is still a man, even when they have a certificate. A certificate doesn’t make a man exempt of moral values.

What if the Doctor is a Christian?: A Christian man will never touch someone else woman. A Christian Doctor will recommend a female patient to a female Doctor.

Gynaecologists even recommend taking children as young as 12 years old to have vaginal exams, even if this means the rupture of the hymen!. Isn't this a case of paedophilia. Are male doctors above the law?

Is your right to fight against these practices to build better societies, and this is a call for institutions and individuals to defend the rights of families.

Actions:

Doctors should clearly indicate in any form of advertisement if they are male or female

The term family doctor should no longer appear in advertisements

Regulate the age of children under male practitioners

No pregnant woman should be put to a male doctor by default - is up to the family to decide.

Regulate and prevent males to go into this area of practice

Written under Freedom of Speech - Human Rights.

add your comments


Yes why not
by El Che Saturday May 12, 2007 at 09:13 AM

Yes I agreed in what you are saying this should be womans business , woman should be the only one to handle birth since she is the one who carries the baby for nine months .
It should be carrie out by woman only not male since they don't have a vagina or breast, and it is a bit disturbing to have some one putting his fingers inside of you and it could be a freaky experience for a 12 year old.
I makes one wonder why there is more males in that profesion but then again it is women who get the most untydepresants and surgery to their genitals .
To me is more the money but this guys all ways have a dark side to themselfs.

add your comments


We've got two intellectual giants here, folks
by Amazed by greatness Saturday May 12, 2007 at 10:29 AM

Yes, I also agree. But why stop at vaginal examinations? Checking for haemorroids should also be only undertaken by a female doctor. A lady does not want a man to view her pink rose leaf, does she?

Come to think of it, a lady should never engage a make doctor to perform any surgery on her. Afterall, you are generally naked when lying on the operating table in theatre, so what's stopping a male surgeon from lifting the sheet and slipping a lubricated gloved finger up to the hilt into your nunna?

Thankyou for raising this vital issue.

Great thinking here by two obvious intellectual giants.

Not.

add your comments


written by a female intellect in the liberal/labour Youth
by einstein Saturday May 12, 2007 at 07:35 PM

Is it erection time again??? nothing better than to blabber idiotic propaganda??? It's just NOT cricket John Howard, you racist prick !!!

Does the government have full power to force a doctor on the population? which stupid doctor would do a body examination without a nurse presence.

thanks for the joke, MIM should remove this idiotic post with full prejudice.

See this is an example of of the 100 word limit encouraging moronic spams

add your comments


oh really
by recent pap semar recipient Saturday May 12, 2007 at 09:16 PM

It is up to a woman (or a man) to choose what gender the doctor is.

To speak of a woman being "forced" to be examined is nonsense. It is an insult to those women and men who are forced to undergo medical examinations without their consent, such as in secure psychiatric environments.

Some women hate men and give their hatred a specious intellectualised cover by call it feminism.

Get a life girl.

add your comments


It is right and action should be taken
by Lets talk about it Saturday May 12, 2007 at 10:48 PM

Yes it is right, and it is against family and morality.

Vaginal examinations are needed to stop cancer and other problems and pregnent families go through lots of pain because of this - However we have a medical profession full of men.

I should be the decision of the family to select the gender of the Doctor. And hospital should make everything possible to respect moral attitudes even in emergencies.

A male Gynaecologist for children - that is sick!

add your comments


A nurse presence?
by Lets talk about it Saturday May 12, 2007 at 11:01 PM

So what, it is still a violation of morality!

This is a valid but controversial topic. If you don't mind having and exam of this nature, then there is nothing wrong with it. However respect families and children.

add your comments


Dynamo Hum
by hopi Sunday May 13, 2007 at 12:08 AM

Perhaps they could get the people over at fuckingmachines.com to design a machine to conduct an exam of this nature by remote control.

But would it be okay then for a male to be at the controls? Or if a man designed the actual machine with camera's and all that?

add your comments


Just do what the mormon do
by jesus Sunday May 13, 2007 at 12:30 AM

Dont accept medical help and praise the lord for a miracle.

and the other person is correct, reduce the power of shysters in psychology field.

Tom Cruise was correct, ADD drugs are bad for kids

add your comments


Let the Hags at it
by Fuckwit Watcher Sunday May 13, 2007 at 03:29 PM

Back in HR and El Che's fatherland they really show how good religio-fascists should organise things for womens' health. How? Well, by having no gynaecologists at all, and, at the least, by having some old hag perform the required genital mutilations on all prepubescent girls.

Let's make these whacko godwallopers right at home here by having more old hags in our health services. We could get rid of the unecessary extravagance of hospitals too, and have gender specific witch doctor clinics on alternate days at our local swimming pools.




add your comments


sick religious shits
by special Sunday May 13, 2007 at 06:04 PM

social power in sexual repressed genitalia .. man exposed his phallus in a public place -- should've seen it!! had no idea of the power of just one dick .. women screamed, children ran, police were called, some of us laughed at the reaction of others.

makes ya think tho don't it.. The fruckuss was caused by a simple dick -- consider traditional societies where dicks are just part of the anatomy ... no reaction whatsoever.

so who put the power in the dick ???

One guess u religious sickos .. how fucked can u get??

there is nothing special about a dick or a cunt u fwits ... unless of course u have severe hangups that some religious freak stuffed into ur head

add your comments


you are a MUSLIM right?
by NOHAMMEDAN Sunday May 13, 2007 at 06:29 PM

I HAVE HEARD IT ALL BEFORE SO IT IS FAMILIAR TO ME!

YOU ARE A MUSLIM AND YOU LIKE TO HAVE SHARIA LAW IN AUSTRALIA.

KICK ALL DOCTORS LIKE IN TALIBAN LANDS AND LET SICK WOMEN FEND FOR THEMSELVES THE BEST THEY CAN..

YEAH, YOU ARE A MALE MUSLIM ALLRIGHT

add your comments


Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
N© Melbourne Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Melbourne Independent Media Center.