Combet bumped into Parliament by Another Liberal Party : Melbourne Indymedia

Bump me into Parliament,
Bounce me any way,
Bang me into Parliament,
On next election day.

Combet to roll-over for Labor* career
May 4, 2007
Greg 'Clark Kent' Combet joins Simon 'moderate man' Crean, Bob 'yellow cake" Hawke and so many other Labore Fakirs choosing to be bumped into Parliament rather than go to jail for the workers and break the unjust union-busting laws. Another Liberal Party executive over-ruled local decision making and parachutes in whom they choose in the Party interest. This is happening across Oz and here in Melbourne too.

Greg Combet will stand for Labor at the next federal election.
ACTU secretary Greg Combet has confirmed he will stand for Labor in the NSW seat of Charlton at this year's federal election.
Mr Combet arrived in the Hunter Valley this morning to meet with local Labor Party members, ABC Radio said.
He rejected criticism from sitting Labor MP Kelly Hoare that he did not understand the concerns of people in the area.
"I've stood up for working people most of my working life and I hope to win people's support here too," Mr Combet told ABC Radio.

ACTU president Sharan Burrow said Mr Combet would not be replaced as the union group's secretary until after the election.
"Greg will stay in his role; he simply indicated that he will contest the parliamentary seat,'' Ms Burrow told ABC Radio.
"He will continue to work as secretary of the ACTU.
"We will carry out the campaign as the leadership team that we have.
"Clearly he will be focused on the electorate he'll seek to represent, but we'll work that out."

( * Labor - they have removed 'U' out of laboUr decision making so that while they Party you Labour kids )

Bigwigs take on rank and file
* Brad Norington * Ozfailin* May 04, 2007

PROMINENT Labor identities are fighting a revolt by locals in western Sydney opposed to former Penrith mayor David Bradbury being installed as the party's candidate against Liberal MP Jackie Kelly at this year's federal election.
The group of Labor members, including the sister of former Labor prime minister Gough Whitlam, were spurred into action yesterday after protests about Mr Bradbury being given a third chance to run against Ms Kelly in the seat of Lindsay.
Mr Bradbury is to be one of 10 Labor candidates installed in NSW federal seats tomorrow, following a decision taken at last weekend's ALP national conference to expedite preselections.
The national executive is also facing protests over a decision to install ACTU secretary Greg Combet in the Newcastle seat of Charlton, held by Kelly Hoare.
Infighting has erupted in the ALP's branches in Lindsay as Mr Bradbury's opponents argue that local teacher May Hayek should run in his place.
A statement of support for Mr Bradbury was sent to Labor's national executive yesterday, signed by 18 party members.
They included Freda Whitlam, former NSW deputy premier Ron Mulock, senator Stephen Hutchins, former MP Ross Free, former state ministers Faye Lo Po and Diane Beamer and seven out ofnine Lindsay ALP branch presidents.
The group said opponents of Mr Bradbury, a tax lawyer for firm Blake Dawson Waldron, represented a "very small minority".
Group organiser Ann Keating said Mr Bradbury would have won a local rank-and-file preselection ballot. But she said the need to start campaigning now meant a Labor candidate had to be placed immediately, in line with the ALP executive's ruling.
Labor's internal battle in Lindsay reflects a split within the party's Right faction.
While Mr Bradbury has historical links to the Transport Workers Union, Ms Hayek is being supported by National Union of Workers state secretary Derrick Belan and is the fiance of Mr Belan's communications officer, Mark Ptolemy.
Mr Belan said yesterday that support for Mr Bradbury came from a "greedy group" that had handed around spoils of office at Penrith council. "They're afraid of a preselection," he said.
Mr Ptolemy said rank-and-file members were tired of Mr Bradbury. "It's time for a breath of fresh air to take on Jackie Kelly," he said.

THE MENZIES DYNASTY SCENARIO
But what if Howard gets back in and the "nicer, kinder" Howhard spin for the Elections gets dropped again ....
can we expect the ALP to call for unjust Laws to broken ? - No.
can we expect ALP braked Union Leaders to go to jail for the members ? - No.
can we expect casualised rank and file workers and those forced from welfare to work to resist by sabotage and direct action on the job ?
YES!

Flowers to the Rebels Faded

By Neale Towart 13/07.2001
http://workers.labor.net.au/102/c_historicalfeature_wobbly.html

With the departure of our own Wobbly, a look at the development of the Wobblies in Australia and their view of Labor politicians and the work ethic seems timely.

One of Michaels' initiatives has been the revival of union radio via the Net and its Wobbly Radio. http://www.wobblyradio.com/
Tom Barker, one of the most well known of the Wobblies, affirmed to Eric Fry the importance of the Wobbly songbook in their agitation and organising.

Verity Burgmann's Revolutionary Industrial Unionism is a fine history of the Industrial Workers of the World in Australia. They predated the Communist Party, and the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 was probably the beginning of the end of the IWW as a major force on the left in Australia. The Communist movement developed rapidly in and out of the ALP and the trade unions from that time. Burgmann makes the connections between the IWW of the early part of this century with more recent radical initiatives in Australian working life. The Draft Resisters Union's anti-conscription pamphlet, produced to oppose the Vietnam War, used the Wobbly poster 'To Arms!!" which earned Tom Barker a stretch in gaol in 1915 (for more on Tom Barker see Eric Fry's interview with him from the 1960s.) Michael Matteson was inspired by this interview having found it at Bob Gould's bookshop in 1965 (you can still get the printed copy from Bob). He also bought copies of the US IWW paper Industrial Worker in the Domain in 1964 from speakers like Col Pollard and Bert Armstrong.

Matteson was inspired by the Wobblies' example to think about the impact of mass resistance, which could turn the ethical stand of many individuals into practical politics. He claimed that IWW tactics were more effective than those inspired by Leninist principles. Those who claim unions need to wrestle with the more individualist ethic these days with the collapse of collectivism could do well to take note of Matteson's point here as we struggle for renewal.

Frank Hardy's famous novel, Power Without Glory also highlighted the differences between the communists and the IWW. Hardy was a member of the CPA when he wrote the novel (and the CPA was instrumental in making sure it got published) and he subsumed the Wobbly legacy into the CPA view in the book. Later he acknoweledged that the book was a "Wobbly novel", "a book that the Wobblies would have appreciated". The ex-wobblies such as Roly Farrall were the most enthusiastic in getting it printed and bound while CPA leaders were pretty hostile.

Pat Mackie was Chairman of the Mt Isa Section of the AWU during the famous 1964-65 lockout. He became the whipping boy of the media during that national divisive episode. "The hard-headed left wing old-timers wanted me, knowing of my industrially militant non-political "Wobbly" inclinations."

Mackie was popular with the miners, but not so with the AWU, who expelled him from the union. During the dispute Mackie toured Broken Hill, and an old miner came up to him and took his hand. He held it to his heart and said "I'm an old miner, by God! I fought through the 1916 anti-conscription thing with the Wobblies, and it's the happiest day in my life that I meet a real honest-to-God Union fighter like we had then!"

Burgmann sees the NSW BLF during the Green Bans era as displaying a Wobbly temper. The very notion of delaying development for environmental reasons rather than just on worker conditions and wages was an example. The way of running the union exemplified a wobbly notion of authority too, with the idea of limited tenure for union officials (Labor Council's departing Wobbly, Michael Costa, pushed this notion for ALP parliamentarians a couple of years ago). Jack Mundey explained "the driving force that made me suggest limited tenure was my own experience of seeing modern, contemporary unionism and seeing the need for some inbuilt guarantee for limiting power and having inbuilt renewal." Mundey was a member of the CPA at the time, and found the idea was unpopular with CPA leaders and CPA union officials such as Laurie Carmichael.

The wobbly temper of the BLF was displayed by its preference for direct action at the point of production, and its distrust of the pretensions of vanguard parties to lead workers in struggle, its belief that trade unions themselves could educate workers to a class-conscious viewpoint, in its dislike of dogma and doctrinal hair-splitting, in its imaginative and inventive tactics, and in its larrikinism and goo-humoured anti-intellectualism. For example when one of its organisers was asked about Lenin's view that revolutionary consciousness had to be brought to the workers by a separate party, he replied simply 'bollocks'. When a student Maoist was addressing one of their meetings, they nailed his briefcase to the floor. The Wobblies might have done the same.

One reason for the continuing inspiration provided by Wobbly deeds and legends to the generation '68 in particular, was the recoil from the horrors of Stalinist communism and the disappointment of Laborism.

From a moderate Labor perspective, the IWW was seen as unnecessary and a messy part of labour tradition in Australia, because of the rapid rise of the ALP and its early successes in getting a worker based party into office and then getting arbitration as a part of the national political framework. Bill Hayden maintains that the IWW were "impossibly idealistic". His father, a merchant seaman, and a wobbly in the US said "direct action appeared justified" in the brutal conditions there. This exemplifies the contrasting histories of the US and Australian labour movements.

Vere Gordon Childe, whose How labour Governs remains a classic view of the disappointments of the ALP in power, saw the IWW as "the first body to offer effectively to the Australian workers an ideal of emancipation alternative to the somewhat threadbare Fabianism of the Labour Party".

The right saw the IWW as standing for I Won't Work, which was a significant part of IWW ideology and agitation, as many of their songs, pamphlets and slogans showed:

Slow Down

The hours are long

the pay is small

So take your time

And buck them all

A pamphlet advocating a six hour was written by A E Brown which argued for the increase in the workers proportion of surplus value, undermining the capitalists.

The songs and slogans were directly addressed to the 'boneheads' who too readily accepted bourgeois values. 'Mr Block' showed this approach:

Please give me your attention, I'll introduce to you,

A man who is a credit to our red, white and blue;

His head is made of lumber and is solid as a rock,

He is a common worker, and his name is M r Block.

And Block, he thinks he may

Be premier some day.

Oh Mr Block, you were born by mistake,

You take the cake,

You make me ache.

Tie a rock on your block, and then jump in the lake;

Kindly do this for liberty's sake.

The distrust of the ALP and labourist ideology was a strong part of the IWW, as the example of Pat Mackie in Mt Isa showed. Michael Costa should remember his Wobbly heritage as he enters the Legislative Council, as there most well known song was Bump Me Into Parliament, written by Bill Casey in Melbourne, and sung to the tune of Yankee Doodle. It expresses the anti-labourist , anti-arbitration views of the IWW

Come listen, all kind friends of mine,

I want to move a motion,

To build an El Dorado here,

I've got a bonzer notion.

Chorus

Bump me into Parliament,

Bounce me any way,

Bang me into Parliament,

On next election day.

Some very wealthy friends I know

declare I am most clever,

While some may talk for an hour or so

Why, I can talk for ever.

I know the Arbitration Act

As a sailor knows his 'riggins',

So if you want a small advance,

I'll talk to Justice Higgins.

Oh yes I am a Labor man,

And believe in revolution;

The quickest way to bring it on

Is talking constitution.

I've read my Bible ten times through,

And Jesus justifies me,

The man who does not vote for me,

By Christ he crucifies me.

So bump them into Parliament,

Bounce them any way,

Bung them into Parliament,

Don't let the Court decay.

This article is largely extracted from Verity Burgmann Revolutionary Industrial Unionism: the Industrial Workers of the World in Australia. Cambridge Uni Press 1995. A great read.

Other histories of aspects of the IWW include Frank Cain's The Wobblies at War and Ian Turner's Sydney's Burning.

The history of anarchism in Australia before the development of the IWW has been most usefully analysed by Bob James in a number of self-published books including Anarchism and State Violence in Sydney and Melbourne 1886-1896 (1986) and brief biographies of Chummy Fleming and J A Andrews. Quite a number of Bob James essays and arguments with Australian labour history are on the web. He has been the labour historian most concerned with uncovering forgotten histories, including the histories of mutuals and friendly societies. See the articles at Takver's site http://www.takver.com/history/index.htm
for historical and current material on anarchism, direct actions and labour history generally.

James and other IWW people would probably take issue with much of what Burgmann says and you can see via the web lots of other histories of anarchism and syndicalism in Australia.

The IWW in Australia continues and via their website
http://www.iww.org.au
you can keep up to date with their activities in Direct Action and links to international branches.

Joe Hockey has been privately telling folks there would be no increase in skilled migration. It seems he was wrong.

Remembering that the Howard government has a historical sensitivity about migration, with John Howard himself successfully flirting with anti-Asian sentiment at one stage, the title of "the record immigration government" might sit uncomfortably alongside its crown as "the highest taxing government".

According to Sophie Morris in the AFR, Tuesday night’s budget will include mention of an extra 5,000 skilled permanent migrants, taking the official quota to 102,500. There will also be $100 million over four years to help humanitarian migrants integrate, learn English and find work.

That comes on top of the open-ended and rapidly-increasing sub-section 457 temporary worker visas and other loosenings of the migration numbers. As the AFR story concludes:

Recently, the government quietly made an extra 4,000 spouse visas available for this year. They will continue to be offered in 2007-08, taking the overall migrant intake with the budget increase to a record 166,000.

There’s no target number for the 457s or the other visas for 457 dependents, but there are 25 DoIC Skilled Migration Industry Outreach Officers (SMIOO) embedded with industry groups encouraging and facilitating their use.

In the December half, 457s were running at an annualised rate of 45,000, but with the extra drive and need for workers, plus the dependants’ temporary visas, it’s not hard to speculate that guest worker visas of one sort of another will hit six figures and keep going. That means a real immigration numbers approaching 300,000 next financial year.

What it’s all about is not John Howard deciding who will come here, but keeping the lid on wages. Without the ballooning skilled temporary and permanent workers, interest rates would already be substantially higher as employers compete for scarce workers.

Instead of the current system of pseudo-democracy we believe in Direct democracy which is based on equal participation. In order to be free & happy, we need to run our communities, our workplaces & our own lives. Freedom is a way of organising society in which everyone has an equal say on how things are run. Freedom is about standing up for ourselves and resisting unfairness; it is about sharing resource so everyone has what they need and it’s about creating a more peaceful world where we are free from poverty, violence and war. Free people believe there are alternatives to the current political system where a minority force their decisions on a majority and where a few people hold all the power and wealth. We want accountable delegates rather than careerist politicians, shared ownership rather than private profit, human need rather than economic growth, & mutual aid rather than Investers Rights Agreements. Politicians say “vote for me!” We say VOTE NOBODY!
And start organising for ourselves!

WE’RE VOTING NOBODY BECAUSE...
”Choosing between politicians in our fake democracy is like choosing between Coke and Pepsi – they’re all the same, just with slightly different packaging” “Putting an ‘X’ in a box every 4 or 5 years is not real democracy. I’m fed up of seeing politicians forgetting about the promises they made to improve our lives once they’re in power.”

“I’m sick of accepting the least worst candidate. Every one of us deserves to have a say in the way our own lives are run. I’m voting nobody and starting to represent myself!”

“Nobody on the ballot represents me, and the very nature of the system means Nobody ever will. Nobody cares about the things we’re really passionate about, and nobody will fight for them except us”

“All politicians are liars - they’ll all keep privatizing everything and crapping on ordinary people”

Vote for Nobody for Victory and remember the Ants.....
Show them that we're not happy with the current system of unfairness this Federal Election. Help get the word out and pass this on to all your networks.

1 Ant can't act alone but in Australia 16 Million Ants can..........!

Don't Vote! It only encourages them.
http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/node/50808
http://www.myspace.com/votenobody
http://www.ANARCHISMFAQ.ORG
http://www.SOUTHWALESANARCHISTS.ORG

Written and authorised by Adam Ant for the Ants...

So far I've managed to note that these things are missing in our so-called "democracy." The democracy you may think you have doesn't exist in Australia today!!! We are calling for an abundance of people who don't believe in the official truth, which is a MONSTER and a lie all the days of your life, to vote for Nobody. So Just Vote for Nobody This Federal Election. You don't live in a democracy you live in a pseudo democracy. The democracy you have when you don't have a democracy. Which is a dictatorship! You don't need a dictatorship! You're not a sheepy.
If John Howard and Kevin Rudd are a democracy then where is the Senate?
COAG is not a Senate! If every time you vote you get a Labor State or Territory and a Liberal Coalition National Govt then you live in a dictatorship. By the way what would happen with COAG if one party ruled both the National and State and Territory affairs? DICTATORSHIP.But if you consider that being a well-paid loser isn't a bad job and pays well then also consider the handshake between Lib/Lab that is a virtual one party.

For instance:
Where is the opposition to WAR?
Where is the opposition to WAR Crimes?
Where is the opposition to Draconian Laws?
Where is the opposition to Refugee Detainment?
Where is the opposition to David Hicks 5 year detention?
Where is the opposition to the AWB scandal?
Where is the opposition to Islamophobia?
Where is the opposition to Political Scapegoating?
Where is the opposition to Neo-Colonialism?
Where is the opposition to False Flag Operations by the CIA?
Where is the opposition to the FTA 'Investors Rights Agreement'?
Where is the opposition to HIV Discrimination?
Where is the opposition to the Privatisation of Health?
Where is the opposition to Desecrating and Ignoring Aboriginal Affairs?
Where is the opposition to subordinating Scientific and Medical Research?
Where is the opposition to Uranium Mining?
Where is the opposition to No WorkChoices?
Where is the opposition to Social Services Reform?
Where is the opposition to Desperate and Disabled to Work?
Where is the opposition to 6 weeks Social Security Payments Cut Off's?
Where is the opposition to Work for the Dole instead of Getting Better Education and Skills for Better Employment Opportunities?
Where is the opposition to Rorting the Social Security System by Corporate Greed?

Related:

Look at this sucker
Election ploy, going for the kids...
Costello sells early childcare rebates
Federal Treasurer Peter Costello says many low income families will now be eligible to receive childcare rebates for the first time.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200705/s1915485.htm
http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2007/05/144552_comment.php#144603