|
 |
 |

Stop Violence Against Women? - its in the hands of the State
by verona
Thursday November 30, 2006 at 09:54 PM
State-sponsored violence against women occurs frequently in Australia, without question. This was only emphasised by the recent police violence against women at the G20 protests in Melbourne
 do_not_question_authority.jpg, image/jpeg, 300x391
I was assaulted by four men on the weekend. One grabbed my arm and pulled me to the ground. One placed both hands on my chest and pushed, and pushed until I fell back. One punched me in the face. And One struck me repeatedly with a long pole.
I was assaulted by four men on the weekend, and now I walk the streets afraid. I cant walk alone. I cant be in crowds. I begin to shake when I see men that look like my attackers.
I was assaulted by four men on the weekend, and now I receive looks of pity in response to my injuries: Right cheek: swelling, tenderness, slight discoloring; Left Upper Arm: Large swelling, bruising - 28x17cms; Left Upper Ribs: tenderness, bruising - 13x8 cms. I went to the hospital to X-ray my ribs and was asked: "did you take a bit of a fall?"
I was assaulted by four men on the weekend, but its okay. Because they were police. And just Doing Their Job.
I have a number of complaints about events during and beyond the G20 protests in Melbourne. That the property damage caused by a small contingent of protesters was somehow more devastating than the real violence enacted by police. That the protesters have been vilified, described variously as being from interstate, and being from overseas. A highly trained violent guerilla army, a group of individuals acting to suit their own agendas. Anarchists, socialists, individualists. So many labels, so much sensationalism from all angles. Right-wing corporate media publishing photos of peaceful protesters and a dial-a-thug hotline. Left-wing groups putting out calls for the "real left" to isolate these demonstrators. And not a skerrick of truth or perspective amongst them.
At the end of the day, police used extreme force to threaten and injure peaceful protesters. Large groups of predominately male police against small groups of predominately female community members. This is nothing more than state-sponsored violence against women.
It is not the job of police to assault members of the community. Under any circumstances. It is the role of the police to protect individuals from harm. Under every circumstance. (Yes, even when big business comes to town).
I will share with you two particular examples of this state-sponsored violence against women. One night a pink Cadillac, freshly painted, planted with seedlings of endangered species and equipped with a solar-powered sound system, parked itself outside Parliament House. Two women locked-on. The police forbade moving the car beyond this point. And so, for 5 hours the car and its chaperones celebrated in the streets - much dancing was had. Until the police returned, wielding batons and throwing people away from the car. One woman was pushed to the ground by four male police officers, kicked in the ribs and beaten with batons. She suffered (among other things) a heavy concussion. Another police officer removed his badge before punching me in the face, threatening to "clean me up".
The next day a small group of musicians (mainly students, and again mainly women) congregated outside the Melbourne Museum to greet G20-delegates on their day trip. The women played their music and danced in the doorways of the museum, until, without prior notice, the police charged. One woman fell to the ground, convulsing, and had to be carried away as the police still chased with batons. Reinforcements were called - our small group of women was soon met with a force of approx 100 police, and 250 riot police. We left once the ambulance had arrived (which the police had refused to call) and were marched blocks away.
Is this what a police state looks like?
Community groups and governments alike run public campaigns to Stop Violence Against Women. Yet no one seems to acknowledge the violence that women often meet at the hands of the State. Violence that occurs when groups of men come to break up a protest, action, or blockade held by women. Violence that is perpetrated against women held in custody (be it short term or long). Psychological Violence - the threat of aggression, the fear to walk the streets, the uncertainty over what could happen to you. Physical violence - being chased, beaten, kicked.
I have heard too many stories of women that have been assaulted at the hands of the State. This violence is not isolated to the convergence against G20 (when we are supposed to have expected it). Women at environmental rallies who without warning have been charged by baton-wielding police. Women demonstrators named "Slut". "Cunt". "Whore". Women incarcerated and beaten by their jailor. Separated from friends. Taunted.
International Law directs the State to protect women from violence and the threat of violence. In 1993 the UN adopted the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women, which addresses violence against women as a human rights violation. Women’s right to be free from violence is also set out in General Recommendation No. 19 of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. (1) The International community demands that: 1. States must respect rights. Government officials, or those acting with the authorization of the state, must not commit acts of violence against women. 2. States must protect women’s rights. The state and its agents must take effective measures to prevent other individuals or groups (including private enterprises and corporations) from violating the human rights of women. 3. States must also fulfill women’s rights. States must ensure the appropriate infrastructure to support laws, policies and practices to eliminate violence against women. States are expected to report on the progress of such laws and policies and to modify features that are ineffective. (2)
Eliminating State-Sponsored Violence Against Women is clearly yet another expectation from the International community that Australia has chosen to disregard.
My body is my own - I will not lose it to the state.
I was assaulted by four men on the weekend, and its not okay.
(1) http://web.amnesty.org/actforwomen/justice-5-eng (2) http://web.amnesty.org/actforwomen/justice-3-eng
women carriying the injured at the melbourne museum
by verona
Thursday November 30, 2006 at 09:54 PM
 woman_being_carried_thumb.jpggzcb5r.jpg, image/jpeg, 500x400
rampaging police at the melbourne museum
by verona
Thursday November 30, 2006 at 09:54 PM
 click to enlarge police_baton_hit_2.jpgfmcmjb.jpg, image/jpeg, 720x576
women at the melbourne museum
by verona
Thursday November 30, 2006 at 09:54 PM
 woman_injured_ambulance_thumb.jpgpw6qsl.jpg, image/jpeg, 500x400
music v the State
by verona
Thursday November 30, 2006 at 09:54 PM
 click to enlarge music-vs-military_extend.jpg, image/jpeg, 600x452
LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 31 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
| TITLE |
AUTHOR |
DATE |
| Inadequate, misogynist, stupid men. |
Superior women united against dickheads. |
Tuesday January 30, 2007 at 06:15 AM |
| Verona NA NA NA NA |
Ossifer |
Sunday January 28, 2007 at 01:33 AM |
| mr. |
reasonable |
Friday January 12, 2007 at 02:50 AM |
| patriarchy |
for the blackshirts |
Tuesday December 12, 2006 at 09:44 PM |
| Catch 22 |
the balls |
Thursday December 07, 2006 at 08:55 PM |
| Isn't violence against men wrong too? |
Jex |
Wednesday December 06, 2006 at 07:55 PM |
| yep |
welter |
Monday December 04, 2006 at 11:17 PM |
| ..and you still fucking whinge |
whinger-watcher |
Sunday December 03, 2006 at 04:43 AM |
| angry |
man |
Sunday December 03, 2006 at 04:24 AM |
| Correction is not violence |
Colonel Hathie (Ret) |
Saturday December 02, 2006 at 06:57 PM |
|
|
|
|