calendar >>>
> yj4tvy3izo
> yj4tvy3izo
> yj4tvy3izo
> yj4tvy3izo
> yj4tvy3izo
add an event >>>
features
   anti-war
   migration
   climate change
   ecology
   students
   work
   health
   gender
   culture
   indymedia
   global news
   anti-nuclear
   anti-racism
   civil liberties
   anti-corporate
   miscellaneous
   social movements

 

announcements list
contributors list

about us
   contact
   get involved
   support us
   editorial policy

resources
   activist groups
   syndication
   links

radio
podcast

engagemedia

search


themes
   white theme black theme




 

 

 


printable version - email this article

View article without comments

Victory at Amcor
by Sally Darity Wednesday August 16, 2006 at 07:54 PM

It appears that the workers at Amcor Flexibles in Preston have won a tremendous victory...Details of the final settlement are yet to come to hand but workers and supporters claim the results as a victory. All legal action against the AMWU and supports will be dropped.

Wednesday, August 16, 2006
Victory at Amcor

It appears that the workers at Amcor Flexibles in Preston have won a tremendous victory.

The last desparate days management hired secruity guards to dismantle part of picket (quickly rebuilt) and organised another phone poll. Yesterday (Tues 15 August) a federal court order was placed on Dave Kerin Union Solidarity coordinator.

Details of the final settlement are yet to come to hand but workers and supporters claim the results as a victory. All legal action against the AMWU and supports will be dropped. Union Solidarity wishes to thank the courage of the Amcor workers who stared down management and the great support received throughout the movement.

add your comments


Fantastic!
by davey Thursday August 17, 2006 at 12:33 AM

All Power to Union Solidarity and the AMCOR workers - I look forward to hearing more about this great victory. Dave Kerin must have been doing something right!!!

add your comments


Ms
by Matilda Thursday August 17, 2006 at 01:26 AM

Wasn't the redundancy process given the "tick" by the AIRC?

add your comments


AIRC
by Union Solidarity Thursday August 17, 2006 at 04:59 PM

Hi Ms

"Wasn't the redundancy process given the "tick" by the AIRC?"

It is our understanding that this was not the case. The AIRC could not intervene. The return to work settlement is that an independent board will re-look at the process and the workers and unions are very confident that the re-examination will see the targetted members retain their jobs.

The history of what exactly the AIRC ruled could be found on their website. Transcripts should be available.

All the best

add your comments


What victory?
by Clay Morgan Thursday August 17, 2006 at 10:20 PM

"Details of the final settlement are yet to come to hand but workers and supporters claim the results as a victory".

Er...then how do we know it's a victory if we don't know the details?

The workers could have been slammed up the arsearooney for all we know.

Give us the facts before making a sweeping statement, dickwad.

add your comments


Ms
by Matilda Thursday August 17, 2006 at 11:23 PM

The union lodged a dispute about the redundancy process with the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC), which was heard on 27 July.

The Commission confirmed the company’s redundancy process was fair.

add your comments


Yes it was a victory
by Loose Cannon Friday August 18, 2006 at 12:03 AM

"what victory?"

Yes it was a victory.

A. The union and workers demand was no forced redundacy. 15 day strike over issue of principal. Company agreed to let everyone back in the gate. Backed off original demand. Process re-examined. Targetted workers will end up staying at the plant.

B. Company used the AIRC to impose return to work orders on the workers. Rank and file members refused to be intimidated. Defied possible fines under new IR laws. Union felt compelled to order a return to work under threat of fines and imprisonment. Workers still refused to refused to buckle. Only when the workers felt that they had achieved original demand did they vote to return to work. Company has withdrawn planned Federal Court action. So Amcor workers the first workers to face down bosses new IR laws.

C. Amcor forced to backdown because strike spread to other plants throughout Australia, hundreds of workers were involved. Possible overseas action was discussed.

AIRC? From Ms
"The union lodged a dispute about the redundancy process with the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC), which was heard on 27 July.

The Commission confirmed the company’s redundancy process was fair."

Again the union interpretation on this is different. Need to get July 27 transcripts to settle the matter. But big deal. So what if the AIRC said it was fair? The AIRC is and alway was a bosses court. The AIRC ordered workers back to work, threaten to sieze the union assests and officials with imprisionment. The AIRC can go and fuck themselves. End of argument!!! Oops am I in comtempt of court?

Which side are you on?

add your comments


Which side are you on?
by Ms Matilda Friday August 18, 2006 at 12:19 AM

The truth.

The original article overlooked a significant fact being the AIRC had no difficulty with the redundancy process. The AIRC process has been employed by both sides of the industrial fence over the years and the fact that its role has been watered down by WorkChoices would suggest it has been anything but the bosses "court".

add your comments


Reference, please
by aaaaa Monday August 21, 2006 at 04:54 PM

Can Ms Matilda please supply a reference to the AIRC transcript or decision? I can find no record of any such hearing on 27 July.

add your comments


Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
N© Melbourne Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Melbourne Independent Media Center.