calendar >>>
add an event >>>
features
   anti-war
   migration
   climate change
   ecology
   students
   work
   health
   gender
   culture
   indymedia
   global news
   anti-nuclear
   anti-racism
   civil liberties
   anti-corporate
   miscellaneous
   social movements

 

announcements list
contributors list

about us
   contact
   get involved
   support us
   editorial policy

resources
   activist groups
   syndication
   links

radio
podcast

engagemedia

search


themes
   white theme black theme




 

 

 


printable version - email this article

Qld threatens laws against nuclear plants
by Anon Thursday June 08, 2006 at 01:28 PM

"It's crazy to suggest we need nuclear plants in a state that has some of the most plentiful coal supplies in the world," he said.

Qld threatens laws a...
nuclear_reactors_jun06.gife0u5uc.gif, image/gif, 550x550

The Queensland Premier has joined other state leaders in threatening to introduce laws blocking nuclear power plants in the state.

Peter Beattie used State Parliament to make his case against nuclear power.

"It's crazy to suggest we need nuclear plants in a state that has some of the most plentiful coal supplies in the world," he said.

Mr Beattie says he is willing to introduce legislation to keep Queensland nuclear-free.

Photo: NO WAY, NO NUKE!!

I strongly oppose any nuclear power use except for medical purposes, and please know, that 60% of the world need for that comes from a teeny tiny reactor in Canada. Therefore we have no need to build another one anywhere. like they are planning(attached here).

Also remember what happened like Chernobyl. Ten years after that tragedy, a doctor in Hiroshima did a research. He picked breast cancer as a sample and checked all the data in Japan, and found certain area up north of mainland Japan(Tohoku area), the rate of breast cancer jumped up high! Chernobyle was the only cause he could ever thinks of, i.e. it travels and contaminates surrounding areas.

Uranium enrichment process leaves some 90% of toxic waste called 'depleted' uranium which is not 'depleted' the danger at all. It is a radio active, heavy metal toxin that the US and UK have been using to cause cancer, leukemia, kidney and all sorts of other lethal diseases as well as horrific birth deformities. And its half life is 4.5 billion years meaning it keeps killing and contaminating forever.

Look at photos from Iraq at
http://www.wilpf.org.au/ and
http://www.morizumi-pj.com/shashinten/thumbnails%20of%20exhibition.html

Also buy and watch

"Blowin' in the Wind"
http://www.bsharp.net.au/

Think well,

Worry about one parrot a year which doesn't fly that high to begtin with, or about human lives and future generations. And in W.A., their facility cannot cope to accept all the electricity the 'ugly' windmills are creating. It can produce plenty!

And we need to change the coal/power stations green!
Technology is there to reduce whatever their toxic exhaust, but costs money. And yet, it would cost LESS THAN 2 weeks spending of our military to fix problems of our hospitals!

Go figure!!

http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/06/114145_comment.php

Related:

Outside View: Nuclear Cancer Factories
by Helen Caldicott

Two thousand years ago Hippocrates laid down the dictum "primum non nocere," or "first, do no harm", meaning it's a physician's moral duty to induce no harm or injury to the patient in the course of treatment.

http://sydney.indymedia.org/node/37279

add your comments


Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
N© Melbourne Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Melbourne Independent Media Center.