RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION MODERN DAY CHRISTIAN CRUSADES : Melbourne Indymedia

QUEEN ELIZABETH THE 2ND AS HEAD OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH AND THE CROWN AND THE VATICAN AS HEAD OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH WHO ALSO MAKES AND LEGISLATES CONSTITUTIONAL AND JUDICIAL LAW FOR THIS MAN MADE RULE OF LAW SYSTEM THAT HAS BEEN INVADING OUR HOME LANDS AND WATERS IN BREACH OF BUNJIL=GODS LAW.
WHO IS THESE PEOPLES ALLEGIANCE REALLY TO BUNJIL-GOD OR A MAN MADE RULE OF LAW.
OUR SOVEREIGNTY OVER THESE LANDS COMES FROM BUNJIL=GOD
THIS IS THE RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION,WE WALKED AND TALKED WITH

BUNJIL =GOD LONG BEFORE THE BIBLE EVER CAME TO THESE SHORES
.
THE CHRISTIAN CRUSADES CONTINUE TODAY THEY ARE STILL PERSECUTING US AND KILLING US IN EVEN MORE INSIDIUS WAYS THEY CAN NO LONGER CRUCIFY US OR SHOOT US DOWN OPENLY SO THEY ARE TRYING TO MAKE US SWEAR OUR ALLEGIANCE TO THE CROWN AND THE JUDICIARY FORCING US TO COMMIT TREASON AGAINST OUR OWN BUNJIL=GOD.

MY ALLEGIANCE IS TO MY BUNJIL=GOD AND NOT TO A MAN MADE RULE OF LAW SYSTEM THAT BASED ON THE PAIN AND SUFFERING OF THE HUMAN RACE AND THE END OF EARTH AS WE KNOW IT.

THESE PEOPLE ARE NO LONGER WELCOME IN OUR LANDS AND WATERS THAT BUNJIL=GOD GAVE TO US.
HOW DARE THIS QUEEN EVEN CONSIDER COMING TO DO THE OPENING OF THE STOLEN WEALTH GAMES.

IT IS TIME TO MAKE AMENDS TO BUNJIL=GOD NOW
HOW CAN THEY FACE THEIR MAKER IN THE SPIRIT
KNOWING THAT WE TOO ARE BUNJIL=GODS CREATION

I WILL BE ISSUING GENOCIDE CHARGES THROUGH THE FEDERAL POLCE IN REGARDS TO THESE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY,EVEN THOUGH THEY WROTE THE LAWS FOR THE WORLD.TO WHICH WE HAVE NO HOPE IN WINNING.ITS BEEN DOCUMENTED.
BUNJIL=GODS LAW IS THE SUPREME LAW AND IS FAR MORE SUPERIOR THAN A MAN MADE RULE OF LAW.AND THESE PEOPLE WILL BE ACCOUNTABLE UNDER BUNJIL=GODS LAW SPIRITUAL LAW FROM WHICH THERE IS NO ESCAPE.
THEN WE WILL HAVE JUSTICE.
NOT ONLY IS THE EYES OF THE WORLD WATCHING AUSTRALIA BUT BUNJIL=GOD IS WATCHING THE WORLD RIGHT NOW/

FOR MORE INFORMATION OR INTERVIEWS PLEASE RING MY MOBILE ON
0431 143 065
SUSAN (CHARLES )RANKIN
JAARA BALLUG FROM THE DJA DJA WURRUNG LANGUAGE GROUP OF THE KULIN NATION (GONDAWANALAND)

Releasing Our People's Spirits that are trapped on the earthly plain

Queen Elizabeth II, as head of the Anglican Church, and the Crown, for the crimes of genocide:

1) Religious persecution: Usurpation of our Ancient Law system.
2) Deliberately inflicting conditions of life.
3) Failing to produce formal written Documents of Consent to the occupation of our lands and waters.

Section 268 of the Genocide Act 2002 crimes against humanity,war crimes and crimes against the administration of the international criminal court

Section 286.5 of the Genocide Act 2002 Genocide by deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction

1) A person (the perpetrator), in this case, Queen Elizabeth II, commits an offence if:

a) The perpetrator (In this case Queen Elizabeth II) inflicts certain conditions of life upon one or more persons: and
b) The person or persons belongs to a particular national, ethical, racial or religious group; and
c) The perpetrator (in this case Queen Elizabeth II) intends to destroy in whole or in part that national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such; and
d) The conditions of life are intended to bring about the physical destruction of that group in whole or in part.

Penalty for breach: Imprisonment for Life.

2) In subsection (1) Conditions of life includes, but is not restricted to intentional deprivation of resources indispensable for survival, such as deprivation of food or medical services, or systematic expulsion from homes.

Genocide by Persecution

Section 268.20 of the Genocide Act 2002 Crime against humanity: Persecution,

Usurpation of our Ancient Law system

1) A person (the perpetrator), in this case, Queen Elizabeth II, as head of the Anglican Church, and the Crown commits an offence if:

a) the perpetrator Queen Elizabeth II, as head of the Anglican Church and the Crown severely deprives one or more persons of any of the rights referred to in paragraph (b); and;
b) the rights are those guaranteed in articles 6,7,8 and 9, paragraph 2 of article 14, article 18, paragraph 2 of article 20 paragraph 2 of article 23 and article 27 of the covenant; and
c) the perpetrator (in this case Queen Elizabeth II) targets the person or persons by reason of the identity of a group collectivity or targets the group or collectivity as such; and
d) the grounds on which the targeting is based are political, racial, national. Ethnic, cultural, religious, gender or other grounds that are recognised in paragraph 1 of article 2 of the covenant; and
e) the perpetrators (in this case Queen Elizabeth II) conduct is committed in connection with another act that is:
(i) a prescribed inhumane act; or
(ii) Genocide; or
(iii) a war crime; and
f) the perpetrator’s (in this case Queen Elizabeth II) conduct is committed intentionally or knowingly as part of a wide spread systematic attack directed against a civilian population

Penalty for breach: Imprisonment for the term of 17 years

2) strict liability applies to:

a) the physical element of the offence referred to in paragraph (1) (a) that the rights are those referred to in paragraph (1) (b) and;
b) paragraph (1) (b) and (d)
INVADING OUR TERRITORIES LANDS AND WATERS IN BREACH OF MARITIME LAW BY;
Failing to produce formal written documents of consent off the Kulin Nation to the occupation of Kulin Nation’s lands and waters free of duress and any undue influence to the occupation of our homelands and waters.

This has never been achieved by past or present governments of today.

Signed
Susan charles rankin
Jaara descendant from the dja dja wurrung language group
Of the kulin nation.
Melbourne vic

The Vatican as head of the roman catholic church to who also makes and legislates constitutional and judicial law.
For crimes of genocide=namely religious persecution=ursupation of our ancient law systems that’s been given to us by bunjil =god from the beginning of creation itself.
(1)persecution
(2)deliberately forcing conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction
(3)failing to seek the formalwritten documents of consent of off the kulin nation to the occupation of kulin nations lands and waters free of duress and any undue influence to the occupation of those said lands and waters.
SECTION 268 genocide is a crime against all humanity under the genocide prevention act (consequential amendments)act 2002
Section 268.5 genocide by deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction.
(1)A person the perpetrator the Vatican as head of the roman catholic church commits an offence if;
(a)the perpetrator the Vatican inflicts certain conditions of life upon one or more persons;and
(b)the person or persons belong to a particular national,ethinical;racial or religious group ;and
(c)the perpetrator the Vatican intends to destroy in whole or in part that national ,ethnical racial or religious as such ;and
(d)the conditions of life are intended to bring about the physical destruction of that group in whole or in part.
Penalty imprisonment for life
(2)in subsection(1)
conditions of life includes but is not restricted to intentional deprivation of resources indispensable for survival such as deprivation of food or medical services or systematic expulsion from homes.
SECTION 268.20 crime against humanity persecution
1)a person the perpetrator the Vatican commits an offence if;
(a)a person the perpetrator the Vatican severely deprives one or more persons of any of the rights referred to in paragraph (b);and
(b)the rights are those guaranteed in articles 6,7,8,and 9paragraph 2 of article 14 article 18 paragraph 2 of article 20 paragraph 2of article 23 and article 27 of the covenant;and
©the perpetrator the Vatican targets the person or persons by reason of the identity of a group or collectivity,or targets the group or collectivity as such;and(d) the grounds on which the targeting is based are political racial national ethnic cultural religious gender or other grounds that are recognized in paragraph1 of article 2of the covenant;and
(e)the perpetrators the vaticans conduct is commited with another act that is;
(i)a proscribed inhumane act;or
(ii)genocide;or
(iii)a war crime;and
(f)the perpetrators the vaticans conduct is committed intentionally or knowingly as part of a widespread systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
Penanlty imprisonment for 17 yrs
(2)strict liability applies to;
(a)the physical element of the offence referred to in paragraph(1)(a)that the rights are those referred toin paragraph(1)(b);and
(b)paragraphs(1)(b)and (d)

Failing to seek the formal written documents of consent of off the kulin nation to the occupation of kulin nations said lands and waters in gondawanaland now known as geographic Australia free of duress and any undue influence to the occupation of those said lands and waters of the kulin nation.

BUNJIL =GOD GAVE US THESE LANDS AND WATERS=we have the language words for the things within this country.the language is written in the country,in the plants and the animals and the landscapes and in the people.
The queens English belongs in England
The Vatican and the roman language belongs to rome.

Wouldnt it be better to use your resources to actually help fellow Aboriginals than waste your time on fruitless court hearings.

I mean whats the point of aruging over what happened to Aboriginals over the past three hundred years everybody knows what happened, it's time to move on as playing the victim not only doesnt get you anywere it also prolongs the suffering.

Look at the Marois and North American( including Canada) Indians they've moved on, if your going to fight for somthing fight for a treaty or somthing, fight for equality agaist the corruption and tribalism that have dominated some Aboriginal communitys where one groups is getting treated better than other because of tribal affilation.

But please dont waste your time on this nosense its a proven failure.

Wow, what a loony!

If she is typical for Abo's, then I have a pretty clear picture why the colonising of Australia went without a hitch. Well, not much was in the way at all, right?

They were all praying to the Bunjib or making up LOONY THINGS.

Nothing has changed since the GREAT BUNJIB said "Now don't you do anything til I'm back, You hear"

This reminds me, I was wondering whether the drafting of the new sedition laws was a new way of dodging the 'no jurisdiction' bullet and the case against the Australian government by Aborigines that is going to the International Court in The Hague?

Does anyone with a legal background know about any ramifications for those cases?

As for the two comments above this one, who let the village idiots out? A couple of questions for them. Do they believe in rule of law? If they do, I would like to see the legislation that orders the invasion of Australia and theft of land. I would to see the documents where the king of england ordered the invasion and genocide. Or, if there are no documents of this nature, I would like to see the signed treaties, or documents of title, where the land was signed over, or sold, to the british crown. Where are they?

If you don't believe in the rule of law, but do believe in law of the jungle (as exemplified by the british crowns invasion and occupation of this country and genocide against its people) then you won't mind when I rob or kill you right?

If you believe in the rule of law, the Australian State is fucked. It's a sham.

One thing is correct from the ramblings of the fools is .....

John Howard and his cronies have too much influence in the Aboriginal communities. Too many greedy elders

If Michael Long sets up an Aborigines Party for the next election, i reckon he will hold the balance of power....

the only problem is that after a wonderful gesture of walking to Canbera, he decides not to do it the second time !!!! What gives.....

if you are going to fight for your people do it the right way, and not half baked measures.

PS. And i hope Michael LOng doesnt join the Laberil Party

Hello Susan,

I assume you are *the* Susan Rankin -
Let me say first I respect your work - you have done a great deal toward the recognition of the events of the past and present in respect to the aboriginal nations of Australia.

But one thing to note is the lack of retrospectivity regarding the genocide conventions of the UN. That doesn't make it impossible - it still, so far as I can tell, goes on, but the evidence is better hidden these days. One major element that contravenes UN charters is the mandatory sentencing, the other is the disproportionate numbers of indigenous people in prison (related of course). Another is the 'birth control' methods still seemingly imposed without knowledge on many aboriginal people, particularly in outlying regions of the country. Also, don't forget the UN tribal conventions, which make such things as face-washing for petrol illegal.

It is, I think, the case that relying on the laws of Australia to achieve justice will do no good. The Australian law system is corrupt and broken, and perhaps it has always been this way.

The UK system is slightly better, because the law lords at least are not in the pocket of the PM, and refuse obstinately to be so.

I suggested to John Pilger that a possible method might be re establishing the right of Britain to choose a governor general (and so doing an aboriginal one), since this law has never, as far as I know, been changed, but rather overlooked.

It would certainly decrease the ability of such corruption, because according to Australian constitution, the GG has the right to dissolve parliament, both houses if need be. It does not mention how often this could happen. An aboriginal GG could ensure responsibility in the houses regarding the land and the people.

But he said, that in his opinion, that time has passed. The faces (paraphrased) on both sides of the fence are the same. It won't happen.

And I believe he is probably right.

Somehow, the change must come from the people - the majority, the white Australians. It disgusts me to say it, but the government has [continued to] infected the people of Australia with their doctrine, making people believe that racism against indigenous people is only evident if you beat a black man up - all else is excusable (such gullibility).

It is not excusable.

It goes much further - we are responsible for the state of things in aboriginal Australia whilst we choose to ignore it (non aboriginal Australians, that is). And the UN does not ignore it, neither does Amnesty International. If it is a pertinent issue to them, and we take their lead on such matters (supposedly) as foreign policy and who is doing wrong in the rest of the world, we need equally to take responsibility when they are facing us and pointing the finger.

I think that what you do is useful - it serves to show what is wrong, with what little [honest] media exposure it receives, and I sincerely hope it suceeds.

I am also sure you are aware of the lack of retrospectivity for trying criminals in the Hague regarding genocide, but it might be worthwhile to focus on information post 2002.

Kind Regards and good luck,

Derek Lane