calendar >>>
> Inlaws and Outlaws
> Lecture - Towards te…
> Towards ten years of…
> Food not Bomb
> 3wr7fzb50j
add an event >>>
features
   anti-war
   migration
   climate change
   ecology
   students
   work
   health
   gender
   culture
   indymedia
   global news
   anti-nuclear
   anti-racism
   civil liberties
   anti-corporate
   miscellaneous
   social movements

 

announcements list
contributors list

about us
   contact
   get involved
   support us
   editorial policy

resources
   activist groups
   syndication
   links

radio
podcast

engagemedia

search


themes
   white theme black theme




 

 

 


printable version - email this article

Defend our universities! Defend our unions! Stop the sacking of Robert Austin
by Lisa Farrance and Liz Thompson Thursday October 27, 2005 at 05:08 PM

The Federal Government has lately intensified its attack on public universities, with the full backing of commercial radio “shock-jocks” and their print-media equivalents. Not content with a complicit media, Nelson and Howard now want compliant, uncritical universities. And RMIT is showing the way.

[Article by Lisa Farrance and Liz Thompson - both elected to the RMIT Branch Committee of the National Tertiary Education Union in 2004]

In April this year the Federal Government announced its intention to cut public funding to universities that fail to implement a range of industrial changes, including the forced introduction of individual contracts, harsher “performance management”, and the abolition of union representation on committees. These Higher Education Workplace Relations Requirements (HEWRRs) not only pre-empt industrial relations legislation; they impose anti-collegiate conditions on the ways universities operate and reduce the independence of university teaching and research.

In this climate, university staff are coming under increasing pressure to restrict their commentary, teaching, research and industrial activities to those deemed acceptable to conservative governments. Academic staff are increasingly expected to “toe the management line” without question. And it’s this new climate within universities which is threatening the very concept of academic freedom and quality education.

A case in point is management’s political attack against an academic at RMIT University, Dr Robert Austin, a long-time academic union member. Currently threatened with the sack, Dr Austin’s case highlights the real threat posed by the Howard-Nelson agenda. In what ways?

Dr Austin is a Hispanic Studies academic employed by RMIT since February to run its Spanish language programs, and Latin American Studies from 2006. He is widely published and read, having produced seven books and with another three underway in a 15-year academic career. Even under the Federal Government’s strict new teaching guidelines, he’s a model teacher. His probation report of 28 September acknowledges “excellent” research performance and “commendable” teaching, leading to a “considerably more attractive” Spanish program. Enrolments have increased by over 20 per cent since his arrival. Dr Austin has already established staff-student exchange programs with prestigious Latin American and Spanish universities. He has just won five federally-funded student scholarships to Chile for 2006. And he has accepted an offer to become an Honorary Fellow of the University of Melbourne.

However, an alliance appears to have formed between right-wing Sun Herald polemicist Andrew Bolt and the new head of International and Community Studies. Both are of the view that industrial action in support of students in their opposition to (the misnamed) Voluntary Student Unionism (VSU) is not a legitimate academic activity. They have both castigated Dr Austin’s re-scheduling of classes to allow students to attend the National Day of Action against VSU on 10 August, even when this had the almost-unanimous support of students, National Tertiary Education Union backing, and the knowledge of immediate management. Indeed the Vice Chancellor, Professor Margaret Gardener, is a public VSU opponent.

But the Head of School has gone one step further than Andrew Bolt. Using Bolt’s article as evidence for Dr Austin’s apparent “lack of collegiality”, the Head has recommended to the Vice Chancellor no less than termination of employment.

Moreover, the Head of School (HOS) and the relevant Pro Vice-Chancellor have used their positions to intimidate sessional teaching staff. On 30 September, the two managers saw fit to accost Robert Austin and a woman union representative who were enjoying coffee with sessional staff in a public café, off campus. The following week, the HOS compelled all Spanish sessional staff to attend a meeting on Dr Austin’s “collegiality” by issuing a “lawful directive”. Both probation meetings organised by the HOS were little more than an opportunity to launch a tirade of insults and provocations, and during the first to harass the woman union delegate.

We call on all staff, students and public education advocates to show their opposition to this attack on intellectual freedom and academic unionism. Management intimidation is not acceptable in any workplace. Let’s not allow this Nelson & Howard – “shock jock” – management alliance to dictate the model for future university administration.

Your response is urgent – the Vice Chancellor has now signed off on the recommendation for termination, to take effect in exactly 6 months. Please send your messages of opposition to this recommendation, and support for Dr Robert Austin, to:

• RMIT Vice Chancellor, Margaret Gardner on vc@rmit.edu.au
• With a copy to campaign coordinators liz.thompson@rmit.edu.au and l.farrance@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au

For campaign updates and commentary see: http://defendrobert.blogspot.com

add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 14 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
Dr Teri Merlyn Thursday November 03, 2005 at 01:31 PM
Some facts... Heather Tuesday November 01, 2005 at 09:57 PM
Andrew Bolts in training? anti-Bolt Monday October 31, 2005 at 04:16 AM
...So Why Penalise Them For Exercising These Rights? Student Saturday October 29, 2005 at 11:54 AM
Students have rights ex-student Friday October 28, 2005 at 08:50 PM
The future of education? Why activism? Friday October 28, 2005 at 07:48 PM
Bolt is taken seriously. The General Public Friday October 28, 2005 at 04:40 AM
Bolt is taken seriously? Scott Friday October 28, 2005 at 02:11 AM
the obvious Jay Thursday October 27, 2005 at 08:24 PM
Bad teachers an ex student Thursday October 27, 2005 at 07:19 PM
Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
N© Melbourne Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Melbourne Independent Media Center.