calendar >>>
add an event >>>
features
   anti-war
   migration
   climate change
   ecology
   students
   work
   health
   gender
   culture
   indymedia
   global news
   anti-nuclear
   anti-racism
   civil liberties
   anti-corporate
   miscellaneous
   social movements

 

announcements list
contributors list

about us
   contact
   get involved
   support us
   editorial policy

resources
   activist groups
   syndication
   links

radio
podcast

engagemedia

search


themes
   white theme black theme




 

 

 


printable version - email this article

View article without comments

Senate Inquiry into Mental Health 2005
by Ann Wansbrough Thursday March 24, 2005 at 10:06 AM
ja@justiceaction.org.au

Senate mental health inquiry includes prisons

Senate Inquiry into ...
mental_health.jpg, image/jpeg, 267x272

Terms of reference

(The Select Committee on Mental Health is calling for submissions, which should be with the Committee by Thursday 28 April 2005.)

A select committee, to be known as the Select Committee on Mental Health, was appointed on 8 March 2005, to inquire into and report by 6 October 2005, on the provision of mental health services in Australia.

With particular reference to: the extent to which the National Mental Health Strategy, the resources committed to it and the division of responsibility for policy and funding between all levels of government have achieved its aims and objectives, and the barriers to progress; the adequacy of various modes of care for people with a mental illness, in particular, prevention, early intervention, acute care, community care, after hours crisis services and respite care; opportunities for improving coordination and delivery of funding and services at all levels of government.

To ensure appropriate and comprehensive care is provided throughout the episode of care; the appropriate role of the private and non-government sectors; the extent to which unmet need in supported accommodation, employment, family and social support services, is a barrier to better mental health outcomes; the special needs of groups such as children, adolescents, the aged, Indigenous Australians, the socially and geographically isolated.

And of people with complex and co-morbid conditions and drug and alcohol dependence; the role and adequacy of training and support for primary carers in the treatment, recovery and support of people with a mental illness; the role of primary health care in promotion, prevention, early detection and chronic care management; opportunities for reducing the effects of iatrogenesis and promoting recovery-focussed care through consumer involvement, peer support and education of the mental health workforce, and for services to be consumer-operated;

THE OVERREPRESENTATION OF PEOPLE WITH A MENTAL ILLNESS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND IN CUSTODY, THE EXTENT TO WHICH THESE ENVIRONMENTS GIVE RISE TO MENTAL ILLNESS, THE ADEQUACY OF LEGISLATION AND PROCESSES IN PROTECTING THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE USE OF DIVERSION PROGRAMS FOR SUCH PEOPLE;

The practice of detention and seclusion within mental health facilities and the extent to which it is compatible with human rights instruments, humane treatment and care standards, and proven practice in promoting engagement and minimising treatment refusal and coercion; the adequacy of education in de-stigmatising mental illness and disorders and in providing support service information to people affected by mental illness and their families and carers; the proficiency and accountability of agencies, such as housing, employment, law enforcement and general health services, in dealing appropriately with people affected by mental illness.

The current state of mental health research, the adequacy of its funding and the extent to which best practice is disseminated, the adequacy of data collection, outcome measures and quality control for monitoring and evaluating mental health services at all levels of government and opportunities to link funding with compliance with national standards; and the potential for new modes of delivery of mental health care, including e-technology.

The recently announced senate inquiry on mental health includes a reference about prisoners'.

(Rev.Dr.) Ann Wansbrough
Senior Policy Analyst
UnitingCare NSW.ACT
PO Box A 2178
Sydney South NSW 1235
Phone 8267 4280 Fax 9283 5658

http://www.geocities.com/nswac14/opinions1

Related:

LUNATICS RUNNING THE ASYLUM

Jupiters Casino is one of the country's chief promoters of a mental disorder that afflicts almost 400,000 Australians and directly affects many thousand more - compulsive gambling. Over 90% of suffers report depression due to their gambling and one in five will attempt suicide. Every year, over two dozen succeed in killing themselves.

More: http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/03/89198_comment.php

Mental Health Tribunal recommendations on forensic inmates

Below is the answer we have received from the Minister for Health regarding prisoners recommended for parole or release by the Mental Health Tribunal FYI

More: http://www.geocities.com/nswac14/archive1/MHTRF.pdf

Submission of the Indigenous Social Justice Association (ISJA) and Justice Action (JA) to the NSW Health Department's

Discussion Paper on the Review of the Mental Health Act.

More: http://home.iprimus.com.au/dna_info/mh/





add your comments


Am I mentally ill for complaining to a psychopath?
by pr Thursday March 24, 2005 at 04:56 PM

Two recent studies suggest that psychopaths are fairly common and are often to be found in high positions in todays corporate state. This can be confirmed by a close examination of the Federal government and the Alternative liberal party ( the ALP ) You don't have to be nuts to complain to them about why they don't do much about mental health issues but you might want to leave the door open and have a witness or two within screaming distance.

add your comments


emotional recovery
by recoveringaddict Monday April 11, 2005 at 10:19 PM

its an ironic situation when they place you in a locked ward for psychosis (resulting from drug use, lack of sleep) the first thing is a shot of god knows what
followed by a (mis)diagnosis, compulsory medication for duration of detention- the added bonus(?) of liquid valium...its a shame that drug addiction isnt a diagnosis.
many addicts diagnosed with bi-polar disorder(going up/coming down) ?

THE DIAGNOSES OF DRUG ADDICTS HAVING MENTAL
HEALTH ISSUES IS A MISDIAGNOSIS IN MOST CASES AS
ADDICTS ARE USUALLY 'OUT OF IT' AT THE TIME.

Usually emotional issues are more the point, hence the need to avoid reality, but mental health wont counsel people who arent on medication.

THERES A GAP IN COMMUNITY HEALTH WHICH NEEDS TO BE FILLED WITH EMOTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES

SO THERES NO NEED TO GET TO THE POINT OF PSYCHOSIS /MEDICATION BEFORE HELP IS FREELY AVAILABLE

But then, stupid me, why would the government support anything that takes from the capital that drug manufacturers create?

I just thank the fact that Im wilfill enough to have known better than to take their shit forever- mind you the warnings from the psych nearly encouraged me to stay on the shit- typical relapse possibility fear factor stuff.

Been off drugs/medication for a couple of years
no signs of 'relapse'
Never felt better!

add your comments


Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
N© Melbourne Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Melbourne Independent Media Center.