calendar >>>
> ...
> Barmah Campaign Fund…
> GLW Annual Comedy De…
> mlks0tljbh
> mlks0tljbh
add an event >>>
features
   anti-war
   migration
   climate change
   ecology
   students
   work
   health
   gender
   culture
   indymedia
   global news
   anti-nuclear
   anti-racism
   civil liberties
   anti-corporate
   miscellaneous
   social movements

 

announcements list
contributors list

about us
   contact
   get involved
   support us
   editorial policy

resources
   activist groups
   syndication
   links

radio
podcast

engagemedia

search


themes
   white theme black theme




 

 

 


printable version - email this article

Queer theory and violence against women
by Sisyphe Sunday May 23, 2004 at 09:12 PM

I want to talk about how queer and ‘postmodern’ theory has affected the ability of feminists and lesbians to organise against, or even to recognise violence against women. In queer and postmodern theory, based on liberal individualism, important forms of violence are renamed ‘transgression’, ‘choice’ or ‘agency’. I shall concentrate on 3 forms of violence here, men’s prostitution abuse of women, the violence of transsexual operations, and the violence of the ‘body modification’ industry.

My starting point is that old but now little understood, feminist slogan, 'Our Bodies, Ourselves'. In relation to violence, I suggest, this has two important meanings:

1/ The objectification of women in which our bodies are treated as objects for others to use, irrespective of our will or personhood, as in rape, child rape, prostitution, are damaging to ourselves. What is done to our bodies affects us. To survive the violent or assaultive use of our bodies we have to learn to dissociate to survive. In relation to prostitution the understanding 'our bodies, ourselves' enables us to recognise the harm of the dissociation that prostituted women have to use in order to survive the violation of the self that is constituted by commercial sexual violence.

2/ The slogan 'Our Bodies, Ourselves' also means that our bodies are not the problem. This was the understanding that underlay the consciousness raising groups that enabled so many women to accept the shape of their bodies and to give up makeup and other disguises. The problems that women and men may have with body shape, or genital configuration, are politically constructed out of a male supremacist society in which women, and some men, are sexually and physically violated by men, in which constructions of gender and the perfect body are used to enforce social control and the creation of male dominance and female subordination. Discontent with our bodies which arises from these political conditions is a political problem, and the mutilation of bodies is an attempt to cut up the bodies to fit them into an abusive political system instead of seeking to change the system to fit the bodies which people actually have.

A basic feminist value is the creation of a sexuality of equality in which we can stay in our bodies and celebrate them as they are.

In conditions of oppression none of these things were easy. In the 1980s there was a backlash against these fundamental understandings of feminism. Feminist work on pornography, on sexual harassment, on makeup, high heeled shoes and other harmful beauty practices were labelled: political correctness; puritanism; anti-sex.

What the forces that fuelled this backlash?

Read full story : "Queer theory and violence against women"

The Sisyphe web site delivers cutting-edge analysis of current aspects of women's condition, including big issues such as wars, biotechnologies, violence, globalization, power relationships, the men's movement, etc. Sisyphe also offers sections dedicated to literature, poetry, education, history and a growing English section. No pop-ups, no advertising, no cookies. A great way to brush up on your French. Bookmark it now! Or hyper-link to it.

English articles on Sisyphe

Prostitution

Ten Raisons for Not Legalizing Prostitution, by Janice G. Raymond
Legitimating Prostitution as Sex Work: UN Labour Organization (ILO) Calls for Recognition of the Sex Industry- Part One and Two, by Janice G. Raymond
The Legalisation of Prostitution: A failed social experiment, by Sheila Jeffreys
Prostitution: Rights of Women or right to women ? by Elaine Audet

Feminism Critics

Elisabeth Badinter distorts feminism the better to fight it, by Elaine Audet
A report from Status of Women Canada about the discursive denial of gender inequalities, by Micheline Carrier
The "Stolen Feminism" Hoax: Anti-Feminist Attack Based on Error-Filled Anecdotes, by Laura Flanders

Health

Friendships between women good for health, by Gale Berkowitz
Canadian Women's Health Network, by CWHN
Good clone, bad clone?, by Abby Lippman
Hormone Replacement Therapy, the "Magic Bullet" Ricochets, by Abby Lippman

Divorce

Children of divorce need our protection, by Michele Landsberg
Divorce Bill's flaws inadvertently aid abusers, by Michele Landsberg

Education

Problem isn't little boys, it's little minds, by Michele Landsberg

Poems for Peace

Poem for Peace, by Elaine Audet
Peace Rally Speech of a 12 year old American Girl, by Charlotte Aldebron

Short cut for all english articles on Sisyphe
Sisyphe home

add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 5 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
not my feminism kimski Wednesday December 06, 2006 at 11:49 PM
Sisyphe ain't no feminist. Supertroll - proud sex worker! Monday February 28, 2005 at 08:24 AM
Sex work is Work queer rt choke Monday February 28, 2005 at 05:30 AM
Reality check Zoe Friday May 28, 2004 at 03:01 PM
real-life experiences redpixel Friday May 28, 2004 at 02:31 AM
Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
N© Melbourne Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Melbourne Independent Media Center.